Former minister for petroleum resources,Deziani Alison Madueke says she did not award $24 billion oil swap deals without a contract and that she would address the issue and others involving her in due time.
In a statement signed by her spokesman, Clem Aguiyi, Mrs Madueke said she did not grant the oil swap deals as alleged but only gave approvals for renewal of contracts. Earlier, Austen Oniwon, former group managing director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), who appeared before the ad hoc committee of the house of representatives, had said the NNPC under Alison-Madueke granted $24 billion oil swap deals without a contract.
She also said Duke Oil, a subsidiary of the NNPC, was given approval for a term in January 2011, like the other companies in question. “Following the recommendation of the then GMD of NNPC, the minister approved OPAs for a new term of 2 years commencing from 1st January 2015,” the statement read.
“The entities recommended by NNPC were Sahara Energy Resources Ltd, Aiteo Energy and Duke Oil. NNPC strongly recommended and outlined the benefits of the OPA over the SWAPs and put forward the case for migration from the OPA and crude exchange (SWAP) Contracts to OPAs fully.
“NNPC posited that the ‘experienced benefits of the OPA to the Federation’, would be much greater. There would have been little need to respond to this particular issue at this time considering that the former minister is still indisposed and would have wished to be left alone to recuperate.
“She will speak for herself in due time. It is nevertheless imperative that records are set straight so that Nigerians and posterity will know the truth.” Aguiyi alluded to some of the initial revelations by Oniwon, saying he only misplaced “approval of extension” for “renewal”.
“Mr. Oniwon was right when he stated that the 445000 barrels of crude oil were the property of NNPC, bought from the federal government of Nigeria at the prevailing rate and therefore as GMD, he did not need the Federal Executive Councillor Presidential Approval to enter into SWAP arrangements that will enable NNPC fulfill its statutory obligations.
“It was also correct that contrary to the picture being painted in the media, not more than 210,000 bpd out of the 445000 bpd lifted by NNPC to ensure adequate supply and distribution of petroleum products were traded under the SWAP arrangement.
“What the GMD required to execute the above was statutory approval from the minister for the companies! Refineries chosen by NNPC to participate in the SWAP arrangement as outlined in section 4 of the Petroleum Act and section 20 of the NNPC Act.
“It is however incorrect to say that the former minister gave ‘approval for extension’ unless ‘extension’ can legally be substituted for “renewal” because what the Minister gave (and the records are there) was approval for ‘renewal of contract’. “And these approvals were given based on letters of request received from the GMD of NNPC.”